Today was the first time that I missed a day of student teaching. :( I was pretty bummed about it, but felt sick enough that I knew I would have been miserable and useless if I showed up at school. I woke up thinking I just had a migraine (which is pretty normal for me), and as the day continued, my migraine got a little better but everything else got a little worse. It's too early to tell if I am getting seriously sick or if today was a fluke. . . I'm definitely hoping for the latter.
Anyway, enough of that. . . . as I mentioned in my video, we have a "
Rock and Roll as Literature" class in which we are teaching sixth and eighth graders about the history of rock, starting with the blues. Both classes are currently doing a
blues project in which, as a group, they are
answering questions about a blues artist and then presenting their info on a poster board.
Of course, these questions are not very hard (when and where they were born, what instrument did they play, etc.) but, of course, the kids still complain. I think that most of their complaining stems from the fact that they are unable to relate to anything they have not directly experienced in their lives. They have no imagination. They're so used to video games and
MTV and "reality TV" that spoon feed pictures right into their laps. If they can't see and hear it immediately, they give up. If they aren't bombarded by it, either by the mass media or life in their own home/neighborhood/barrio, then they simply don't comprehend that it exists.
When Mr. Johnson and I were putting together the list of artists we wanted the kids to learn about, there ended up being a few more artists than there were groups of kids, so I did a poster to show them
1. a nicely put together example
2. that it's not all that hard, and I was able to do it in one class period
The artist I researched was Bessie Smith, and even as a music major, I had never heard of her . . . the blues isn't really stressed anywhere in the music education process, although I'm not sure why that is. The point of my little rant here is that she was actually pretty cool. She was a phenomenal blues singer dubbed "the empress of the blues" and was the first blues recording star. Her first album, recorded in 1923, sold over a million copies in its first year. Selling a million albums now is a big deal, so imagine how big it was in 1923. She was invited to sing with the big name performers of her day, including Louis Armstrong. Also, she was the highest paid black performer of her time, making $2,000 a week. To be the highest paid performer AND a woman was a pretty impressive accomplishment.

Much like the big stars of today, Bessie Smith made a name for herself personally. Even without the crazy paparazzi and tabloids, rumors circulated about her sexuality. Rather than denying the claims that she was gay (she really was), she ran with the publicity and wrote songs about liking women. So many people nowadays cannot or do not feel comfortable being openly gay, so the fact that Bessie did back in 1923, when it was much more frowned upon. . .. I think it's pretty awesome. It's also awesome that none of this hype negatively affected her career.
If my middle schoolers could look beyond the surface, they'd find that her story isn't much different than that of the MTV stars they adore. Bessie's shows were elaborate and her popularity often caused enormous crowds at her shows, resulting in extra police/security. There was always drama involving her marriages and fights with significant others (helllllo, Britney Spears and K. Fed?), she was known to sometimes drink more than she should, and was a huge party girl during her day.
Bessie was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and influenced lots of other bigwigs in the music world, including:
Aretha Franklin, Billie Holiday, Frank Sinatra, and
Janis Joplin.
So, middle schoolers, you can claim that the blues has nothing to do with rock, but I beg to differ.